Weshoot.com

The Official We Shoot Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • To Comment

Archive for July, 2010

New Technology . . .

Monday, July 19th, 2010

A couple of months ago, a bit of new technology for editing images was announced.  Adobe Photoshop CS5 was available for purchase.  At the moment, I have CS4.  Previously, I used CS2.  I usually skip one iteration of the program to justify the expense and pain of buying and installing it.  However, the newest version has something called “content aware” that, if it works as advertised, will be a great time saver and make my life easier.

I am usually able to upgrade at an affordable price, as I spent what I considered a lot of money some years ago, buying the program at full price.  Adobe allows upgrades to go way back.  They still even allow you to upgrade from CS2 at the same low price at which I am able to buy it.  Some people look to get pirated versions of this program to get a lower price.  My advice is:  don’t do it.  Adobe has figured out how to make the real program inoperative without legacy key numbers and a new key number to unlock the program.  Buy from a reputable seller.  Amazon may be reputable, but every seller on Amazon may not be.

No matter how much technology costs, we all have to deal with it to get the job done.  I felt the one new feature was worth the money it cost to upgrade, as well as it having several other attributes.

One complaint by professionals on a retouching forum on the ‘net is basically, “There goes the neighborhood,” about the relative ease the new program adds to retouching, allowing amateurs to retouch with aplomb.  Don’t be too dismayed.  There still is a barrier to entry.  The cost for the full program at Adobe is close to $700.00 USD.  Even if somebody can afford to buy the program, it doesn’t make them a Photoshop expert and know how to get the most out of it.  Many who have it don’t know how to really use it.  However, these people tend to give the work away, and it affects the price true pros can charge for their work.

Frequently, I am told, “I need it yesterday.”  Clients seem to wait until the last possible minute before contacting a photographer.   I therefore want to make it so I can turn the work out faster and easier to meet that challenge.

So, if you want to call yourself a professional, you have to buy into it.  It may mean doing without something else in order to stay current.  Less lattes can mean more Photoshop or more computer memory.  I am not talking about some secret weapon that will let you get a jump on the competition, but to stay even.  It may be fun, but more often, it is a business decision needed to get the work out. 

-Gary Silverstein

Tags: competition, competitive, cs4, cs5, current, edit, forum, Photoshop, retouch
Posted in Tips | Comments Off on New Technology . . .

Shooting a new product . . .

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

Shooting a new product is something commercial product photographers face all the time.  Sometimes the client has ideas about how it’s supposed to look, sometimes not.  At times, it is easier to give the client the look he or she wants, if they spell it out, as opposed to “You’re the photographer.  You come up with a great image.  You’re the pro.  That’s what you’re being paid for.”  Or something to that effect.

The following product shoot fits the latter scenario more than the first:

I had three bottles of an inexpensive nail polish to shoot.  The bottles contained glitter.  I wanted to show the bottles to be more powerful than they are.  After all, from my perspective, if one is seeing the nail polish in an ad, it should appear to be, well, more than nail polish.  The bottles themselves were less than perfect.  In a big money promo shoot, a photo stylist will sift through many bottles to find the perfect ones.  Sometimes the manufacturer supplies the products, and sometimes the stylist has to go to several retail outlets to get the most perfect props for the image.  In the case of the nail polish, it was three colors of glitter nail polish – a red, an orange, and a green.  In this case, it was a low-budget shoot, meaning no stylist.  Also, I found only one local outlet for the product, and they had a limited supply.  So, I picked out the “best” bottles.

Next, I had to prepare them for the shoot.  Cleaning dust and fingerprints off needs to be done.  It is harder to remove these blemishes with editing software than cleaning the bottles physically.  I used an anti-static cloth, and a can of Blow-Off to remove the aforesaid marks and dust.

I placed them on a translucent white square mounted over a studio strobe.  This lights them from underneath and eliminates shadows.  It also provides white light behind the clear parts of the glass.  See setup image below, example 1.

After adjusting three studio strobes and the camera for the exposures I wanted, I then captured the image you see in example 2. As you can see, the color is way off due to the lighting changes, so color correction was in order.

With numerous changes made in Photoshop, including adding more glitter than I could get from lighting alone, I created the image in example 3.  Glitter comes from adding a small light source to shine on the glitter.  I used a bare bulb on one strobe and shut off the strobe part so the modeling light would act as a small light source (hence the yellowness in example 2).  I increased the time exposure to allow that bulb to put enough light on the subject to appear bright against the instantaneous strobe light.  I also used a “mine flashlight” (the green object to the left front of the nail polish bottles in example 1) to shine on the bottles.  I additionally added small specs of glitter to the bottles with a “bling brush” in Photoshop in several colors.  I had to add the colors and rectangles and shadowing to the background.

What if I told you that given the “You’re the photographer . . .” speech above that once the image was shot, there were several tries with internet communication about colors and backgrounds before the client was happy.  Like I said, it is sometimes easier to make the client happy when they have a clear image of what they want, and they convey that idea to the photographer.  Otherwise, it is a real challenge to guess what the client will like, and it may take several tries.

In the end, it is nice to see the finished product.  But very few know how much work and dedication go into that finished product.  Now you have an idea.

-Gary Silverstein

Example 1 - Click on image to enlarge.

Example 2 - Click on image to enlarge.

Example 3 - Click on image to enlarge.

Tags: advertising, glitter, Marketing, nail polish, photograph, photographer, photography, promo, promotional
Posted in Learning | Comments Off on Shooting a new product . . .

Losing track of why we market!

Monday, July 5th, 2010

My partner and I frequently hear, “Professional photography is not in the budget.”  Or, “We have no budget for photography in our marketing.”  But the issue that keeps cropping up for me is that I think these companies lose sight of what is really important.

First, if a company is marketing itself, how many of them think that prospective clients really have time to read a lot of text about their company?  Since most marketers know that time is of the essence, photographs say a lot more than words do in a short period of time.  If the company markets itself with substandard images, e.g. underexposed, blurry, or just plain amateurish shots, what does the prospective client think?  The client subconsciously thinks that what this company does is shoddy work and it is mirrored in the substandard images!  The real problem is that the selling company sees gre at photography in the light of what it costs as an expense instead of what it costs for the bottom line.  Why do you think Target spends so much money and time on those TV ads?  Great photography translates to a fatter bottom line for Target.

The other day, I received a brochure in the mail from a local hospital.  It had a number of what I would say are stock shots:  happy, smiling people dealing with the hospital as patients or employees.  To the untrained eye, this was acceptable.  However, the only image of the hospital exterior itself was taken by someone who could best be described as a novice amateur.  While the image appeared sharp, it appeared severely underexposed under the awning in the area of the front door.  It looked for all the world like someone ran outside with their point-and-shoot camera and got an image to be used in the brochure.  It was free, a no-cost shot.  But, was it really?  The people who took this shot were either unwilling or unable to get something better.  As a pro, I would have taken several exposures of the entrance, at different exposure settings.  This would have allowed me to cut the contrast and make the entranceway almost as light as the building by combining the shots to make a good one, either by HDR or masking techniques.  The resultant image would have made the doorway a much more inviting look.  Do you want to walk into a doorway in darkness?  Hospitals are scary enough, without making the image appear foreboding.  How many patients won’t contact this hospital, just because this image puts them off psychologically?  If they lose just one, it will cost them more than hiring a good pro photographer, considering what healthcare costs these days.  And I’ll wager they’ ve lost more than one client.

So, the end result is that while the hospital saved on not hiring a pro photographer, it cost them much more out of their bottom line.  All because they forgot one thing.  Good marketing isn’t about how much you spend on it, it’s about how much you get back from its execution.

If you are going to spend money on any marketing pieces, make it count.  Go for the best paper, printing, graphics, and text.  But above all, don’t stint on the photography.  It can make or break the rest of what you are trying to do.

-Gary Silverstein

Tags: advertise, advertisement, advertising, business, Marketing, photographer, photography, professional
Posted in Marketing | Comments Off on Losing track of why we market!

  • Categories

    • How To (20)
    • Information (546)
    • Learning (30)
    • Lighting (179)
    • Marketing (290)
    • Photographs, Images (543)
    • Tips (38)
    • Uncategorized (2)
    • video (13)
  • Archives

    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • May 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • September 2013
    • June 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • October 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • December 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • March 2011
    • December 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 - weshoot.com | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)

WordPress theme designed by web design